16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:44 am
Not bad for dam ner stock eh?
(dynoed 119.58 whp @ 122.99 wtq)
(dynoed 119.58 whp @ 122.99 wtq)
Minnesota Focus Owners Club
Minnesota's Only Focus Enthusiast Group
https://mnfocus.com/forum/
16.5 @ 85
Page 1 of 1
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:13 am
very nice
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:43 am
Damn you are doing everything in that car.. dyno.. track. What's next? Autocrossing track times?
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:50 am
What were your 60 ft's....
With bolt on's on my zetec I was running mid 15's (with a mid 90's trap)... Your numbers seem a bit high amd your trap is pretty low. So what are you 60 foots?
With bolt on's on my zetec I was running mid 15's (with a mid 90's trap)... Your numbers seem a bit high amd your trap is pretty low. So what are you 60 foots?
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:16 am
Psssh bolt ons that included LSD, Stage 4 clutch disc, and your banned bitch cams 
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 am
OH!!
I totally forgot about the Banned Bitch Cams!! LOL
I totally forgot about the Banned Bitch Cams!! LOL
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:44 am
No,that was pre-cams and all that. I had the LSD but such shitty old tires, I had to pussy out my launch. My 60's weren't overly impressive for this matter, like 2.2's-2.3's.
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:52 am
Thats cuz your car is slow...you bum.
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:32 pm
they still do seem high tho, i was pulling 15.7's with intake, chip, header, cat back exhaust on my old zetec as well.
and my 60ft's were in the 2.4 range with 88-90mph traps
and my 60ft's were in the 2.4 range with 88-90mph traps
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:53 pm
So I might have a 15sec Station Wagon!? WOOT! lol
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:15 pm
So I might have a 17sec Station Wagon!? POOT? lolo2designs wrote:So I might have a 15sec Station Wagon!? WOOT! lol
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:47 pm
LOL, thats what you get for having sun roof and leather...excess weight...LOL I could maybe get into the 15's if I took my rack out...lol
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:52 am
That's what she said Kyle
I couldn't resist
I couldn't resist
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:29 am
LMAO...I've only ever had 1 girl tell me that...lol
Re: 16.5 @ 85
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:38 am
Well, all I have is the Magnaflow Mid-pipe.
As for what i'm doing, it was a last minute thing, and I wanted to shut my friend up with a 95 Eclipse that said his car was "SO MUCH FASTER." I beat him 2/3 races, the one I lost, I missed 3rd.
I don't have my slips in front of me, but my 60's were probably not impressive. Remember, this is my first manual car, and have only been driving it for less than 5 months. I wouldn't doubt it if my driving skill was KILLING my times. This car is most likely capable of easy 16.3's, but like I said, im no pro.
As for what i'm doing, it was a last minute thing, and I wanted to shut my friend up with a 95 Eclipse that said his car was "SO MUCH FASTER." I beat him 2/3 races, the one I lost, I missed 3rd.
I don't have my slips in front of me, but my 60's were probably not impressive. Remember, this is my first manual car, and have only been driving it for less than 5 months. I wouldn't doubt it if my driving skill was KILLING my times. This car is most likely capable of easy 16.3's, but like I said, im no pro.